I admit that I am not a professional photographer, just one who enjoys the art and creating it. However, it was 1982 that I acquired my first camera from a professional photographer friend who owned a camera store. He recommended I buy the Canon AE-1 Program. He always use to say “Buy your second camera first”. I think it was because we would accelerate in our growth of photography and we would want to keep buying cameras. The thing is, at that time all we had was film, so upgrading every two years wasn’t necessary. Today, new cameras with more megapixels are sold to us every year, creating an envy for the new stuff with all the new features. Wow, can you image a camera that has both Wifi and Bluetooth, and GPS built in. Articulating screen or not? Nikon or Canon, Sony or Fuji or Olympus, DSLR, Mirrorless or Micro four thirds (I still can’t wrap my head around that one). One thing is for sure, no matter how many megapixels is in your camera, the cost to shoot one frame is FREE compared to the cost of film. I have purchased 35mm film, taken pictures and had it developed and scanned the negatives onto a disc. The result is, that the quality is never what I can get out of my DSLR. And then add in the post processing, I have a beautiful image to print. With all the news about film making a comeback, does it really have to? I do not get enjoyment from spending money on 24-36 images (if I am lucky). My bet is that some people will rush to eBay to buy a used film camera for nostalgia sake or to try it out for the very first time. That’s fine. It was expensive for me back in 1982 and it still is today. What do you think?